Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 23:51

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What are the top 10 online courses for high-income AI skills in 2024?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
New ‘Dungeons & Dragons’ Single-Player Video Game in the Works - Variety
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Japanese culture: Is it true adult adoption is common in Japan?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What’s next?
Bristol-Myers Squibb: You Might Wish You Bought More Now (Upgrade) (NYSE:BMY) - Seeking Alpha
Thank you.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Fifth measles case in Georgia confirmed in family member of person with earlier case - 11Alive.com
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Bitcoin Price (BTC) News: Testing $110K Level Again - CoinDesk